\t\t\t\t20101101 18:41:00 redazione-IT<\/p>\n
[b]The government is trying to build a protected autonomy for the Jewish majority and a stunted autonomy for the Arab minority. [\/b]<\/p>\n
Sintesi dell’articolo comparso su Haaretz:
\n(Segue l’originale in Inglese)<\/p>\n
La proposta di legge che consente ai comitati di piccole comunit\u00e0 di respingere i candidati se non rispondono a determinati criteri – \u00e8 un lupo travestito da agnello. A prima vista, non \u00e8 possibile rifiutare un candidato per motivi di razza, religione, sesso, nazionalit\u00e0 o disabilit\u00e0 fisica." In realt\u00e0, a causa di una formula che stabilisce come criteri di ammissione "la mancanza di idoneit\u00e0 di un candidato per il tessuto sociale-culturale della comunit\u00e0", la proposta consente di escludere chi non \u00e8 un sionista, cio\u00e8 gli arabi e altri "non idonei "candidati. In questo modo continua la discriminazione nei confronti del cittadino arabo nel settore dell’edilizia abitativa.La popolazione araba in Israele soffre di discriminazione per l’ assegnazione di alloggi, per la mancanza di terreni derivante dalla massiccia espropriazione, per la mancanza di volont\u00e0 di ampliare le aree edificabili nelle citt\u00e0 e nei villaggi, per la mancanza di un piano di sviluppo autorizzato.<\/p>\n
Oltre alla discriminazione in molti settori, quali l’istruzione e l’occupazione, vi \u00e8 una crescente consapevolezza che gli arabi siano cittadini diversi, che non godano di pari diritti e che si voglia cacciarli via. Il risultato \u00e8 l’accrescersi di ostilit\u00e0 tra arabi ed ebrei. . Ci sono quelli, come il Prof. Ruth Gavison, che sostengono il concetto di "separati ma uguali" in linea di principio. Eppure, anche queste persone devono riconoscere che nelle attuali circostanze di disparit\u00e0, l’esclusione degli arabi dagli insediamenti comunali \u00e8 discriminatorio e razzista nei loro confronti.Le giustificazioni sono dubbie: timore di un calo del valore degli immobili, timore di matrimoni misti, timore di focolai di violenza.Una minoranza non pu\u00f2 essere umiliata da divieti contro gli appartenenti a un determinato gruppo. In discussione non \u00e8 solo la libert\u00e0 di un residente di scegliere i suoi vicini,ma anche il modo in cui lo Stato assegna le proprie attivit\u00e0 economiche. Lo stato non ha il diritto di discriminare su base nazionale-etnica. Dovremmo accettare l’ipotesi che gli argomenti utilizzati per giustificare il blocco degli arabi hanno la precedenza sui diritti di uguaglianza e di dignit\u00e0 umana, allora questi argomenti si applicherebbero non solo alle piccole comunit\u00e0, ma anche a tutte i centri abitativi in Israele.Una simile possibilit\u00e0 non ha alcuna legittimit\u00e0 in una societ\u00e0 democratica. Vi \u00e8 quindi una linea retta che collega questa proposta di legge ai rabbini di Safed che ingiungono di non vendere o affittare gli appartamenti agli arabi. Fino a quando lo stato ha una maggioranza ebraica, il suo carattere ebraico sar\u00e0 mantenuto , fin quando gli ebrei sono la maggioranza, non vi \u00e8 preoccupazione per la conservazione della loro identit\u00e0 di gruppo, quando gli arabi sono una minoranza la loro identit\u00e0 collettiva \u00e8 minacciata.L’isolazionismo nazionale di questa proposta mira a favorire approfondir\u00e0 l’alienazione e ostilit\u00e0. La separazione tra arabi ed ebrei in Israele \u00e8 estrema: un ebreo-israeliano pu\u00f2 attraversare la vita senza incontrare un arabo-israeliano. \u00c8 cos\u00ec le paure, gli stereotipi si generano .Senza dubbio, la proposta promuove la visione del partito di Yisrael Beiteinu di far scomparire gli arabi. E ‘anche chiaro che se la legge dovesse essere approvata, la Knesset otterr\u00e0 un grande "successo", infatti fornir\u00e0 munizioni ai nemici di Israele che affermano che si tratta di uno stato razzista ,uno stato dell’apartheid.<\/p>\n
——————<\/p>\n
[b]ISRAEL: South Africa is already here<\/p>\n
The government is trying to build a protected autonomy for the Jewish majority and a stunted autonomy for the Arab minority. [\/b]<\/p>\n
How could the Israeli public allow a few dozen racists go down into the lion’s den of Umm al-Fahm on their own? Do Michael Ben-Ari, Baruch Marzel and Itamar Ben Gvir represent only themselves or just the fringes of the extreme right? After all, thousands of Israeli citizens agreed when they heard the thugs’ explanations of the reasons for their march.<\/p>\n
Hundreds of thousands in Israel are pleased with the Citizenship Law, glad that the bill will, when it passes – and it will pass – allow discrimination against Arabs who will want to buy a home in a Jewish community, and the majority of the public considers MK Hanin Zuabi a traitor.<\/p>\n
Where were all these people while the fascists marched through Umm al-Fahm? Suddenly they are not comfortable being seen with those who reflect precisely the zeitgeist?<\/p>\n
Participating in this march should have been Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, MKs Anastassia Michaeli and David Rotem, the settler leadership, the followers of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the heads and residents of Jewish communities in the Galilee, as well as the owners of homes in Tel Aviv and Ra’anana who refuse to rent apartments to Arabs. This march should have carried the banner "[National] Pride Parade." Alas, only 1,300 participants showed up, along with the police force that protected them.<\/p>\n
But they are certainly not alone. They simply do not need yet another demonstration. Israel’s apartheid movement is coming out of the woodwork and is taking on a formal, legal shape. It is moving from voluntary apartheid, which hides its ugliness through justifications of "cultural differences" and "historic neglect" which only requires a little funding and a couple of more sewage pipes to make everything right – to a purposeful, open, obligatory apartheid, which no longer requires any justification.<\/p>\n
In South Africa of the 1950s, the whites were afraid even of the white immigrants, lest they bring with them liberal ideas that would affect the local volk.<\/p>\n
But mostly they feared the blacks. In a short period of time the insular white community adopted a series of laws that were meant to preserve their purity. In 1949, the Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act was passed; in 1950 and 1957 the Immorality Act and amendment made interracial sexual relations a criminal offense carrying a seven year prison sentence. In 1950, in the Population Registration Act, each citizen was categorized racially. In 1953 the Bantu Education Act was passed which established that the blacks will receive a different and lesser education than the whites, and in 1950 the Group Areas Act was passed which determined "group regions," establishing where each racial group could live and which led to the expulsion of 3.5 million blacks from their homes.<\/p>\n
This listing is presented here as a service to the racists in the Knesset, in case they did not know what kind of legislation to propose in order to complete their plan. This is also a public service for those who did not participate in the Umm al-Fahm march, so that they will know what they should require of their representatives.<\/p>\n
With considerable delay, the South African Group Areas Act is now being copied into Israel’s book of laws. An individual can no longer purchase land, build a home or even rent an apartment in small communities in which the absorption committee opposes their presence. According to Adalah – the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel, the law will "protect" 68.3 percent of all communities in Israel from being "stained."<\/p>\n
The remainder of communities, and especially the large cities, will have to continue, for the mean time, to make do with voluntary apartheid. But the days will also come, as they did in South Africa, when an appropriate solution was found for its cities. It will be possible, for example, to grant homeowners committees the authority to determine who can buy or rent an apartment in a building. After all, what is good about a small community should also be good in an even smaller building. And of course a law which encourages snitching will also be passed.<\/p>\n
So, while the government of Israel is trying to gain Palestinian recognition for its Jewish identity, it is building within it the double identity of the state. A protected autonomy for the Jewish majority and a stunted autonomy for the Arab minority.<\/p>\n
Israel is quickly defining the borders of the Arab autonomy and through apartheid legislation it is granting the Arab minority a legal standing of enclaves with lesser rights; of a cultural-ethnic region which, because it is being expelled from the broader who, can also demand international recognition for its unique standing.<\/p>\n
http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/print-edition\/opinion\/south-africa-is-already-here-1.322052<\/p>\n
\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"